(about this blog)
Who needs one more blog about the art of writing? You know YOU do. You are not alone. Read it and weep.
Reading for Writers
On waking early and reading the newspaper online while the
rest of my family still lay sleeping, I grabbed onto a single five-syllable
phrase I had encountered in a review of a current production of "The
Iceman Cometh":
"booze has lost its kick"
I stole this particular phrase because, on first read, I
found that its pointy letters had pulled together into an iron fist and smashed
me in the gut.
I immediately engaged it in combat.
I had been eager for a worthy opponent. It was four o'clock
in the morning and I was fully awake and bored out of my mind. I had been up
since three, silently listening to the raging wind of the winter storm exterior
to my warm and cozy condo, and had only moments before finally crept downstairs
and turned on my laptop. As usual, it took a great deal of effort to ignore the
soft snores of my husband and children, who were still sound asleep and
blissfully unaware of my ensuing struggle with words.
I surprised myself, that I was able to tackle this latest phrase-demon
so calmly, given the stinging still resounding in my heart from the long, sharp
knife it had inserted there in round two of our title bout. It had stabbed me while I was still gathering the weapons at my disposal for the fight ahead. I congratulated myself that I was a writer who had
been regularly following a disciplined regimen during the early morning hours.
This almost invariably led to a new batch of quality wordsmithery being accomplished
before dawn. In the wee-est hours of the morning, before sunlight could float in and break the spell, I tried to arm myself, with only my keyboard and my memories. I prepared to do battle, with my muse as my second. I usually emerged hours later, victorious and breathless, just as the
male units of my household were ready to slide out from between sheets and into
fuzzy bathrobes, wanting breakfast, ready to start checking off their own to-do
lists for the day.
The phrase that had attacked me this morning I would show no
mercy. I would rip it to pieces. I had to find out what it looked like on the
inside, to try to discover what it was about this alphabetic construction that
had set my nerves on fire.
I dug in my claws, tore it apart with my gnashing teeth, and
from its rent flesh, I created this haiku:
prayer to Saint Jude
(haiku)
booze has lost its kick
memories haunt and won't let go
there is no escape
On re-reading this masterpiece of mine, I immediately began
wrestling with self-doubt. The poem appeared flimsy, inadequate, vague,
mundane, mangy, and dull.
The phrase I had word-napped from the theater critic was
trite, which I had known from the time I first spied it, from a comfortable
distance, as one who was reading the phrase merely as a seeker of new information.
In my mind, I had argued with the author of the review about
his choice in words. Were they really his? I was sure I had read these five
words, in this particular order, someplace before.
Had he stolen these words? Where had they come from? Had he
invited them in, or had they been simmering in the recesses of his mind, having
taken up residence after they had forced their way in through some other
author's pen? If they weren't new, and they weren't fresh and clean and his
own, and they barely did the job they were supposed to be doing, then why had he
settled? Why had this writer stuck his readers with this ordinary-sounding
phrase? The writer of the theater review was obviously being paid handsomely for
his thoughts by one of the most prestigious newspapers extant. Why had an
experienced word-wrangler allowed the commonplace into his composition? Why had
he not expended a truer effort, and invented a unique set of words to say the
same thing, to say it better?
Had he been off his game? Or had he, in fact, anguished over
the possibilities that had presented themselves, and decided that these
particular five words would have to do because no others could even come close?
What was it, about booze and regret, that demanded the use
of this exact five-word phrase, "booze has lost its kick," by this theater critic, working for one of the most widely-read newspapers of our time?
Unfortunately, before I could find the answer I sought, I grew tired of the tussle with the trite. I decided there was nothing to be gained in insisting upon integrity in word play with an unknown author. Realizing that if I, a reader, had had trouble in reading the odd phrase, the writer himself probably hated his own five-word construction, Maybe he just had a bad day, maybe he was just a bad writer who happened to hold a good job. My sympathy for him as a fellow writer led to a resolve for me to do something special with his words.
I revisited the phrase in question, "booze has lost its kick." I recalled an old adage, "If you can't beat 'em, join 'em." I decided to let this poor excuse for a descriptive phrase have its way with me. I rewrote my haiku, adding one last bit, a re-hashed word-combo, which I designed to point out the flawed nature of the trite word phrases slouching through the poem:
Unfortunately, before I could find the answer I sought, I grew tired of the tussle with the trite. I decided there was nothing to be gained in insisting upon integrity in word play with an unknown author. Realizing that if I, a reader, had had trouble in reading the odd phrase, the writer himself probably hated his own five-word construction, Maybe he just had a bad day, maybe he was just a bad writer who happened to hold a good job. My sympathy for him as a fellow writer led to a resolve for me to do something special with his words.
I revisited the phrase in question, "booze has lost its kick." I recalled an old adage, "If you can't beat 'em, join 'em." I decided to let this poor excuse for a descriptive phrase have its way with me. I rewrote my haiku, adding one last bit, a re-hashed word-combo, which I designed to point out the flawed nature of the trite word phrases slouching through the poem:
booze has lost its kick
memories haunt and won't let go
they beat me senseless
they beat me senseless
I gave up, and let the Idiom Monster win...for today...
"I'll be back."
Writing Exercise: The Longest Month
The stretch which is February
seems as long as the time between that horrible moment when, suddenly gasping
for air, you realize you've tried to drink your soda too quickly and it has
gone down the wrong pipe; and the the time when you can finally stop coughing
up bubbles and tears and recognize that you will probably live and breathe again
and maybe even swallow normally again at some point in the future.
Letters from Abigail Adams
Great writers are also avid readers. Enjoy these fascinating
excerpts of letters from Abigail to her husband, John Adams.
Source: Massachusetts Historical Society
History during the years
1775-1777: The invasion of the British
upon the American colonies
QUOTE
"Humanity obliges us to be affected with the distresses and miseries of
our fellow creatures. Friendship is a band yet stronger, which causes us to
feel with greater tenderness the afflictions of our friends. And there is a tie
more binding than humanity, and stronger than friendship, which makes us
anxious for the happiness and welfare of those to whom it binds us. It makes
their misfortunes, sorrows and afflictions, our own."
QUOTE [on the
need to take care of our health and the inevitability of death]"The fabric
often wants repairing and if we neglect it the Deity will not long inhabit it,
yet after all our care and solicitude to preserve it, it is a tottering
building, and often reminds us that it will finally fall."
QUOTE "Your
minute description of the persons you have seen are very entertaining to
me."
QUOTE "I am
not conscious of any harm that I have done, or wished, to any mortal. I bear no
malice to any being. To my enemies, (if any I have), I am willing to afford
assistance; therefore towards Man, I maintain a conscience void of
offense."
QUOTE "Your
desire that I would write at every opportunity is punctually observed by me,
and I comply with your request, although I have nothing more to say than How do
ye? and when will you return? These questions perhaps may appear trifling to
others, yet to me they are matters of the highest importance."
QUOTE "I
hope I have drawn a lesson from that which will be useful to me in the future,
viz. never to say a severe thing, because, to a feeling heart, they wound too
deeply to be easily cured."
QUOTE [December,
roads impassible] "Alas! How many snow banks divide thee and me, and my
warmest wishes to see thee will not melt one of them."
QUOTE "We
are told that all the misfortunes of Sparta were occasioned by their too great
solicitude for present tranquility, and by an excessive love of peace they
neglected the means of making it sure and lasting. They ought to have
reflected, says [ancient Greek historian] Polybius, that as there is nothing
more desirable or advantageous than peace, when founded in justice and honor,
so there is nothing more shameful and at the same time more pernicious when
attained by bad measures, and purchased at the price of liberty."
QUOTE "We
have too many high sounding words, and too few actions that correspond with
them."
QUOTE [on noting
the town's readiness for military invasion] "We live in continual
expectation of alarms. Courage I know we have in abundance, conduct I hope we
shall not want, but powder—where shall we get a sufficient supply?"
QUOTE [as war is
becoming an immediate reality] "I do not now wonder at the regard the
ladies express for a soldier—every man who wears a cockade appears of double
the importance he used to, and I feel a respect for the lowest subaltern in the
army."
QUOTE "The
Day; perhaps the decisive Day is come on which the fate of America depends. My
bursting heart must find vent at my pen."
QUOTE [on the
military occupation] "The present state of the inhabitants of Boston is
that of the most abject slaves under the most cruel and despotic of
tyrants."
QUOTE "How
difficult the task to quench out the fire and the pride of private ambition, and to sacrifice ourselves
and all our hopes and expectations to the public weal."
QUOTE "My
pen is always freer than my tongue. I have wrote many things to you that I
suppose I never could have talked."
QUOTE "I am
more and more convinced that Man is a dangerous creature, and that power
whether vested in many or a few is ever grasping, and like the grave cries
give, give."
QUOTE "Be
kind enough to burn this letter. 'Tis wrote in great haste and a most incorrect
scrawl it is."
QUOTE "I
want to say many things I must omit, it is not fit to wake the soul by tender
strokes of art, or to ruminate upon happiness we might enjoy, lest absence
become intolerable."
QUOTE "How
many are the solitary hours I spend, ruminating upon the past, and anticipating
the future, whilst you overwhelmed with the cares of state, have but few moments
you can devote to any individual. All domestic pleasures and enjoyments are
absorbed in the great and important duty you owe your country, "for our
country is as it were a secondary God, and the first and greatest parent. It is
to be preferred to parents, wives, children, friends and all things, the Gods
only excepted. For if our country perishes, it is as impossible to save an
individual, as to preserve one of the fingers of a mortified hand." Thus
do I suppress every wish, and silence every murmur, acquiescing in a painful
separation from the companion of my youth, and the friend of my heart."
QUOTE "I can
not say that I think you very generous to the ladies, for while you are
proclaiming peace and good will to men, emancipating all nations, you insist upon
retaining an absolute power over wives. But you must remember that arbitrary
power is like most other things which are very hard, very liable to be
broken—and notwithstanding all your wise laws and maxims we have it in our
power not only to free ourselves but to subdue our masters, and without
violence throw both your natural and legal authority at our feet."
QUOTE "What
can be the reason I have not heard from you since the 20 of April, and now 'tis
the 27 of May. My anxious foreboding heart fears every evil, and my nightly
slumbers are tortured; I have sent, and sent again to the post office, which is
now kept in Boston at the office of the former Solicitor General, not one line
for me, although your handwriting is to be seen to several others. Not a script
have I had since the General Assembly rose, and our worthy friend Warren left
Watertown. I fear you are sick. The very idea casts such a gloom upon my
spirits that I cannot recover them for hours, nor reason myself out of my
fears."
QUOTE "My
heart is as light as a feather and my spirits are dancing. I received this
afternoon a fine parcel of letters and papers [from you] by Coll. Thayer, it
was a feast to me. I shall rest in quiet I hope this night."
QUOTE [signature,
on the distance between them] "O that I could annihilate space."
QUOTE "I
this day received by the hands of our worthy friend a large packet, which has
refreshed and comforted me. Your own sensations have ever been similar to mine.
I need not then tell you how gratified I am at the frequent tokens of
remembrance with which you favor me, nor how they rouse every tender sensation
of my soul, which sometimes find vent at my eyes, nor dare I describe how
earnestly I long to fold to my fluttering heart the dear object of my warmest
affections. The idea soothes me, I feast upon it with a pleasure known only to
those whose hearts and hopes are one."
QUOTE "I
feel no great anxiety at the large armament designed against us. The remarkable
interventions of heaven in our favor cannot be too gratefully acknowledged. He
who fed the Israelites in the wilderness, who clothes the lilies of the field
and feeds the young ravens when they cry, will not forsake a people engaged in
so righteous a cause if we remember his loving kindness."
QUOTE "I
received a letter from you by Wednesday Post 7 of July and although I think it
a choice one in the literary way, containing many useful hints and judicious
observations which will greatly assist me in the future instruction of our
little ones, yet it lacked some essential ingredients to make it complete. Not
one word respecting yourself, your health or your present situation. My anxiety
for your welfare will never leave me but with my parting breath, 'tis of more
importance to me than all this world contains besides. The cruel separation to
which I am necessitated cuts off half the enjoyments of life, the other half
are comprised in the hope I have that what I do and what I suffer may be
serviceable to you, to our little ones and our country; I must beseech you
therefore for the future never to omit what is so essential to my
happiness."
QUOTE "Last
Sunday after service the Declaration of Independence was read from the pulpit
by order of counsel. The Dr. concluded with asking a blessing upon the United
States of America even until the final restitution of all things. Dr. Chauncy's
address pleased me. The good man, after having read it, lifted his eyes and
hands to heaven -- God bless the United States of America, and let all the
people say amen. One of his audience told me it universally struck them."
QUOTE "P.S.
We are in such want of lead as to be obliged to take down the leads from the
windows in this town."
QUOTE "I
have spent the 3 days past almost entirely with you. The weather has been
stormy, I have had little company, and I have amused myself in my closet
reading over the letters I have received from you since I have been here."
QUOTE [staying at
her aunt's house] "I have possession of my aunt's chamber in which you
know is a very convenient pretty closet with a window which looks into her
flower garden. In this closet are a number of book shelves, which are but
poorly furnished, however I have a pretty little desk or cabinet here where I
write all my letters and keep my papers unmolested by anyone. I do not covet my
neighbor's goods, but I should like to be the owner of such conveniences. I
always had a fancy for a closet with a window which I could more peculiarly
call my own."
QUOTE "Here
I say I have amused myself in reading and thinking of my absent Friend,
sometimes with a mixture of pain, sometimes with pleasure, sometimes
anticipating a joyful and happy meeting, while my heart would bound and
palpitate with the pleasing idea, and with the purest affection I have held you
to my bosom till my whole soul has dissolved in tenderness and my pen fallen
from my hand./How often do I reflect with pleasure that I hold in possession a
heart equally warm with my own, and full as susceptible of the tenderest
impressions, and who even now while he is reading here, feels all I
describe./Forgive this reverie, this delusion, and since I am debared real,
suffer me, to enjoy, and indulge in ideal pleasures—and tell me they are not
inconsistent with the stern virtue of a senator and a patriot."
QUOTE "You
know not how disappointed I was tonight when the post came in and I received no
letter from you. 'Tis the first Saturday's post which has come in since I have
been in town without a letter from you. It has given me more pain tonight than
it would any other time, because of some false and foolish reports, I hope./I
will not, more than I can help, give way to rumors which I have no reason to
believe true. Yet at such a time as this when all the malice of satan has
possessd our foes, when they have recourse to secret poison, assassination and
every wicked art that hell can muster, I own myself alarmed and my fears
sometimes overpower me./But I commit you to the great guardian and protector of
the just, and trust in him that we shall meet and rejoice together, in spite of
all the malice of earth and hell.../Little Charles stands by and sends duty to
Pappa, says, Mamma, did you get any letters on Saturday? No. Then, why do you
write, Mamma?"
QUOTE "How
unfeeling are the world! They tell me they heard you were dead with as little
sensibility as a stock or a stone."
QUOTE "I
know your health must greatly suffer from so constant application to business
and so little exercise."
QUOTE "While
you are engaged in the senate, your own domestic affairs require your presence
at home, and your wife and children are in danger of wanting bread. If the
senate of America will take care of us, as the senate of Rome did of the family
of Regulus, you may serve them again, but unless you return, what little
property you possess will be lost. In the first place, the house at Boston is
going to ruin. When I was there I hired a girl to clean it, it had a cart load
of dirt in it. I speak within bounds. One of the chambers was used to keep
poultry in, another sea coal, and another salt. You may conceive how it looked.
The house is so exceeding damp being shut up, that the floors are mildewed, the
ceiling falling down, and the paper moldy and falling from the walls. I took
care to have it often opened and aired while I tarried in town. I put it into
the best state I could."
QUOTE "I
know the weight of public cares lie so heavy upon you that I have been loathe
to mention your own private ones."
QUOTE "The
best accounts we can collect from New York assure us that our men fought
valiantly. We are in no ways dispirited here, we possess a spirit that will not
be conquered. If our men are all drawn off and we should be attacked, you would
find a race of amazons in America."
QUOTE "There
are particular times when I feel such an uneasiness, such a restlessness, as
neither company, books, family cares or any other thing will remove, my pen is
my only pleasure, and writing to you the composure of my mind."
QUOTE "What
is said of the English nation by Hume in the reign of Harry the 8th may very
aptly be applied to them now, that they are so thoroughly subdued that, like
eastern slaves, they are inclined to admire even those acts of tyranny and
violence which are exercised over themselves at their own expense."
QUOTE "The
young folks desire Mamma to return thanks for their letters which they will
properly notice soon. It would have grieved you if you had seen your youngest
son stand by his Mamma and when she delivered out to the others their letters,
he inquired for one, but none appearing he stood in silent grief with the tears
running down his face, nor could he be pacified until I gave him one of mine.
—Pappa does not love him, he says, so well as he does brothers, and many
comparisons were made to see whose letters were the longest."
QUOTE "I sit
down to write although I feel very languid; the approach of spring unstrings my
nerves, and the south winds have the same effect upon me which Brydon says the
Siroce winds have upon the inhabitants of Sicily. It gives the vapors, blows
away all their gaiety and spirits and gives a degree of lassitude, both to the
body and mind, which renders them absolutely incapable of performing their
usual functions./He adds that it is not surprising that it should produce these
effects upon a phlegmatic English constitution; but that he had just had an
instance that all the mercury of France must sink under the weight of this
horrid leaden atmosphere."
QUOTE "I
really think this letter would make a curious figure if it should fall into the
hands of any person but yourself—and pray if it comes safe to you, burn it./But
ever remember with the tenderest sentiments her who knows no earthly happiness
equal to that of being tenderly beloved by her dearest Friend."
QUOTE "'Tis
ten days I believe since I wrote you a line, yet not ten minutes passes without
thinking of you. 'Tis four months wanting 3 days since we parted, every day of
the time I have mourned the absence of my Friend, and felt a vacancy in my
heart which nothing, nothing can supply. In vain the spring blooms or the birds
sing, their music has not its former melody, nor the spring its usual
pleasures. I look around with a melancholy delight and sigh for my absent
partner. I fancy I see you, worn down with cares, fatigued with business, and
solitary amidst a multitude."
Forms of Poetry
GLOSSARY: "poem" "haiku" "senryu" "found haiku" "haiga"
poem
A "poem" is a word or words that move a person, either a writer or a reader. More specifically, whatever the poet says is a poem, is a poem. He should know. He created it. The same goes for the reader; when a reader comes into contact with words and says, "That's poetry!" it is poetry. Additionally, anything besides words that evokes in the mind of a person the feeling that they have just had a poetic experience, is defined as poetry.
Traditionally, a poem is a beautiful word drawing, meant to capture the essence of a strong emotion and place it in the reader's mind. It has been gained through the poet's close observation, fostered by his recognition of a truth about human life.
This recognition of a universal truth creates a feeling of connectedness among those who come to an understanding and full appreciation of this truth, of themselves with other people and with the universe. It creates in them a calmness, of a sense that one has a place within that universe. It imports an intuition that one is in possession of a particular knowledge about that space and about oneself.
Alternatively, the poetry consumer may gain a sense of a shared knowledge, between himself and the poet and others who appreciate the poem, that there really is no rhyme or reason to the universe; so there is no hope of one's finding placement within it, nor a particular connection to it, nor to other people. This feeling, too, of the futility of believing that there is a connection possible, paradoxically connects a person with others who have also recognized this futility as a truth not to be denied, but to be embraced.
Whatever is the feeling induced by the poetic experience, it stands to comfort both the poet and the reader in a way that is biologically satisfying. This wakes up the area of the brain used for honing the social skills necessary for survival, which makes both the creation and consumption of poetry a particularly personal and invasive, beneficial, physical experience.
Traditional forms of poetry additionally follow specific, identifying, constraining rules, limiting the number of syllables in a line or requiring a particular number of lines, which each must follow a particular structure in rhyme or meter or both. A form of poetry may also require the poet to address a particular subject matter or mood.
haiku
A traditional formal haiku is a work of art that can only be created in a pen and ink drawing using the characters of the classical form of the written Japanese language. It is a succinct poem of three lines, one longer line in the middle of two shorter lines. The poet shares his acute observation of the workings of nature. He captures the essence he feels during a singular moment in which he so deeply experiences an intimate relationship with an element of the natural world that his eyes are opened and a truth concerning the human condition is revealed.
This form of haiku specifically does not rhyme nor contain rhythmic structural elements other than that it is composed of three lines, the first and third shorter than the second. The poem is very short; a haiku is spoken aloud during the interval of a single breath.
The joy of haiku is not forever reserved to those familiar with the brushstrokes used to convey the classical Japanese language. Haiku has more recently been redefined as a poem which evokes the haiku experience. It may be created in any language and in any medium. A haiku is a short poem containing an acute observation which leads the poet, as well as his reader, to an emotional, intellectual, and/or spiritual insight.
"Natural haiku" contains reference only to that which is observed in the natural world, that untouched by humans, and has its roots in the earliest haiku created by the ancestors of the modern Japanese. No direct mention is made of the existence of any human thought or activity, nor of any physical material which has been constructed by or touched or changed in any way by people. What the poet does notice is the way the natural world changes, especially from season to season.
Less constricting forms of haiku do contain reference to humanity. In creating a haiku which contains both an observation of nature and an observation of the world of people, a poet may use one to illustrate and deepen the feeling for and understanding of the other.
The experiencing of a haiku evokes a sudden change in perspective which creates a surprise. The reader recognizes the point where the poet made the creative leap into awareness. Both the poet and the reader share in this "aha!" moment.
To increase enjoyment of modern haiku, an attempt is made to incorporate as many elements of traditional haiku as possible. The reader knows the "rules" of traditional haiku and enjoys encountering instances in the poem where he can recognize a "proper" use — of a seasonal word, a surprise, etc. — much as one might enjoy a scavenger hunt.
A non-rhyming poem is considered to be a haiku in form as long as it is very short and is comprised of three lines, with an effort made to conform to the same syllabic balance seen in the traditional Japanese form. Many haiku written in the English language are extremely brief.
When spoken aloud, a carefully-constructed 5-7-5 haiku, a subset of traditional American haiku, will contain exactly seventeen syllables in three ordered lines of exactly five, seven, and five syllables, respectively. Unless, of course, it doesn't. Even a true 5-7-5 haiku may contain more or fewer syllables in any one line, or add up to a number different than seventeen, due to the quirkiness of the poet or the expediency of word selection. Precise language and poetic feel always trump syllable count. Though the 5‐7‐5 structure is the aim, any close approximation to that structure is acceptable to all but the 5-7-5 haiku purist.
When considering the number of syllables in a word, consider how dictionary descriptions of the structure of a word and regional pronunciation may differ. A poet may also use words in an unexpected manner, altering the number of pronounced syllables, for emotional or dramatic effect. Consider, for instance, how the word "Mommy!" may be stretched into three or more syllables by a child riding in the back seat of the family car with her brother, complaining, "Mom-mee-eee, Jeffrey's touching my doll again!" Jeffrey's reply, "No, I'm not!" could be pronounced either in a most definite three-syllable "No! I'm! Not!" or in just two, "Nome Not!" The acronym written "ASAP" may be slowly pronounced "a, s, a, p" by a high-school guidance counselor in gently recommending that his student send in his college applications by the end of the month, or it could be barked "A sap!" by a boss snapping orders to an experienced team of hustling sales clerks.
Appreciation of haiku demands an oral reading, to hear for oneself how the poet intended the haiku to sound. Syllable count depends on the speaker, who may be in a particular emotional state or may be using a local dialect.
Consider that the word "poem" may be spoken as containing either one or two syllables. In reading aloud a 5‐7‐5 haiku, a reader must experiment to discover the poem's correct syllable structure. The puzzling out of the haiku's conformity, or not, to the spoken 5-7-5 structure is part of the poetic experience. This mental work has the effect of involving yet another area of the brain, activating it during the frenzy of poetic excitement. This area, normally relegated to the performance of math and music, is also aroused during the experience of forms of poetry which use strict metrical constraints.
The appearance in a haiku of a "season word," such as "snow," triggers a physical memory of the sensory reactions normally experienced within only one of the manifestations of the fluctuations of weather. There occurs in the deepest, primal portions of the brain a recognition that the human body resonates with the natural world. One is instantly prompted to remember that seasonal change is cyclical. This realization evokes an emotional reaction to the knowledge that human life also follows a natural and inevitable course of continuous change. People are born, age, and die.
Each moment in life happens but one at a time.
By zeroing in on one particular tableau, the haiku poet helps a reader to see how important to the big picture are each of the individual moments in a life. Each instant can be noticed and fully appreciated.
The definition of haiku, similar to the definition of a poem, is further expanded to include anything at all deemed to be haiku by its creator or by a person who experiences a haiku moment. Any haiku can be found to be actively breaking any or all of the rules of haiku and still be declared a haiku by the haiku enthusiast.
senryu
A senryu is any haiku that follow/breaks the rules of traditional haiku but calls for its own label because it has less to do with a reference to nature and more to do with the dark humor which results from close observation of human behavior.
haibun
When a poetic story must be told that wants greater lattitude than that afforded either poetry or prose alone, the artist may combine prose with poetry, usually a haiku, to form a haibun.
found haiku
"Found haiku" results from a reader's having fortuitously recognized that, hidden in plain sight amongst the words of prose he is reading (in some other context), there appear to be all the elements of a haiku poem. The bits which comprise the haiku are then carefully collected and stored for future enjoyment.
Knowing that such treasures as "found haiku" exist in the wild adds a level of excitement to all reading, a reminder to keep one's eyes open. A haiku might be so close that, if it were a snake, "it would'a bit ya!"
haiga
"Haiga" is a work of art that combines a haiku with an image. A haiga's haiku and its image each add to the story.
The picture is not merely a beautiful backdrop or a decoration, but part of the message, deepening and broadening the meaning and feeling of the poem in a targeted way.
The picture tells a story independently of the haiku, and the haiku draws one deeper into the picture, for a broader artistic experience.
Allusion
Critics of the now nearly-ancient famous English writer
Alexander Pope complain that his style of literary criticism was too
"creative." He translated, edited, and commented on many great works
of literature, but not without leaving his own special fingerprint on the
result. As we read Pope's rendition of Homer's epic poems, The Illiad and The
Odyssey, we have no way of distinguishing when we are experiencing a connection
with Homer's thinking or Pope's.
Whereas critics now also complain about Pope's style of
writing, they admit that his works are rich in references to pop culture and
historical events, concluding therefore that therein lies the greatest value to
students of his poetry.
Pope's immersion in and complete understanding of the
religious experiences and literature of his day also provided him with a
reference that, as a writer, he used to full advantage, giving a richness to
his poetry. Readers also familiar with these aspects of his culture will have a
greater appreciation for the depth of his communications.
In ancient times, a Greek writer referring to Greek
mythology to enhance the meaning of his work would have completely lost the
ancient Japanese reader unfamiliar with the author's milieu, and vice versa.
Similarly today, writers are faced with an extraordinary diversity in
background among their readership around the world. As in ancient times, there
is no common cultural experience among peoples to draw upon for richness in the
literary experience.
American writer Emerson "solved" this problem
through the use of metaphor from his observances of nature, which he assumed to
be a universal experience. However, today, we no longer share his intimacy with
the natural world. Urbanites may never have stood under a waterfall, watched a
kitten being born, milked a cow, woken to the sound of a songbird newly arrived
from the north, or followed a well-traveled path through a forest. Most have
not observed a milkweed pod open and spill its fluffy contents, and then
followed with their eyes the seed, dangling from its puffy parasail; nor
guessed what path it would take in dancing forth, following the slightest
breeze up into the skies and out of sight. How do you feel, when first you
notice there are no new spring leaves on a newly failing majestic oak? When was
the last time you climbed as high as you dared up the ever-slendering branches
of a tree on top of a hill, just to get a better view of the clouds? Did you
discern, in the sky's slowly shifting shapes, the outlines of your favorite
furry forest friends? I have. I have smoothed the feathers of a dead baby bird,
discovered fallen from its nest and mysteriously stilled by the forces of
nature before it had had a chance to mate and build a nest of its own. I found
its nest, deserted by parents and siblings, and placed the fluffy creature back
in place, with a plea to the woodland fairies to perform their promised magic
and make it sing and fly again.
The closest we now come to a universally-common experience
is in our reckoning with the sky, which covers us all. However, light pollution
has rendered enigmatic most allusions referring to the constellations. Sunrise
over the ocean is unobservable by all but a few, as is sunset over the
mountains. There are no common birds, as each area of the world has its own
selection of species, each with its own songs and behaviors. Bees sting us only
when we live in places where bees live. Mice scurry only where there are no
rats and cockroaches to eat their dinners first.
What common experience of nature do we now share? Not even
the drenching rains, which do not fall in snow-persistent regions. Encounters
with wind might seem to be a universal experience, until one considers the
differences in how wind is constant in some areas of the world, intermittent
with stillness in others.
Yes, we all have spiders. But, of different sizes and with
different natures, some aggressive, some furtive. Two eyes, six, or eight.
Hairy, or smooth. Jumping, or creeping. Even their webs are constructed in
various ways, some intricate and elaborate, some simple and merely orderly.
Each region of the globe can depend on finding a unique but predictable set of
indigenous spiders.
How common is our physical form? Our experience of our own
human biology is pre-fashioned by the culture in which we find ourselves
immersed. I may start to feel cold when the temperature of the air reaches down
to touch sixty-seven on the thermostat, and choose to put on a sweater or turn
up the heat. Children raised in the arctic are perfectly comfortable without
clothes in the fifty-five degree temperatures inside an igloo. Those living in
the hottest climates may wear very
little clothing, but some wrap themselves from head to toe to protect against
the heat. I once read of the discovery of an unclothed Australian aboriginal
tribe that had not taught their children that "cold" is something
that should change one's perception of a person's interaction with the
environment. Even after acculturation, in the freezing, windy, and rainy season
they were perfectly comfortable in their own skins. They showed no interest in
wearing shirts, pants, or shoes, much less the warm coats and boots offered by
their benevolent "discoverers."
If we retreat into the recesses of our own minds, will we
there find common ground? We discover instead, or even especially, that our
thoughts provide no universality. Contrary to popular belief, a smile does not
mean the same thing in every language. The ideas of "love,"
"childhood," "sex," and "spirituality" are all
human constructs, with differences more likely than similarities, when
comparing what is found in different societies.
How, then, does one write, to express one's thoughts to an
audience that spans, not just the globe, but across the eons of time? Will
there always be another Alexander Pope, to pick up the pieces of what he finds
and make them real again for his own audience? How do we convince the Alexander
Pope of five hundred years from now that our own words are still viable and
worthy of refreshment? How do we find the eyes of anyone, any people beyond our
own selves, who might enjoy having our unique words splashed across their
consciousnesses, to be mingled with their own thoughts, and twisted into new
and original constructs, and, having passed through, go on to infect others? My
own family has not the time nor patience to indulge me with reading more than a
page or two of my words over the course of a month. Why would anyone else even
attempt that sort of intimate connection?
Homer did it. Shakespeare did it. They took universal fears
and hopes and dreams and magnified them. They hooked us with blood and gore and
sex and lies and duplicity and lust and greed. It was funny, entertaining.
Should we do the same? To make successful humor, we must get
to the filth of it, so the reader can be interested, yet detached. The reader
wants to see the horrors of the world defeated, the villains vanquished, the
heroes compensated for their heroic efforts. The world saved, to live again.
We will write instead of the inner journey. As the drama
swirls around outside, the maelstrom threatens to consume us from within.
Who will understand us? How can we explain ourselves, even
to audiences in the present, much less those of the future, when we have so
little of a common background that our obscure references go unappreciated?
A writer could include an in-depth explanation of what each
of the elements in the work means within its context.
Or, a writer might forge ahead blindly and ignore those
readers who might miss the inside jokes. More simply, a writer must focus on
writing the familiar.
Just "Pick an audience, any audience!" Write for
them and hope they will understand exactly what it is that you, personally a
stranger to them, are trying to say. And when they don't understand you, simply
throw up your hands and say, "I give up!" Then, pick up your writing
and continue wherever it was you were when you left off.
How many of you readers "got" that humorous
allusion to the magic trick, "Pick a card, any card!"?
There are as many varieties to that trick as there are
magicians. Some card tricks require a stacked or a "trick" deck. Some
use an ordinary deck but require the collusion of an accomplice, to play the
trick on an unenlightened patsy. At the conclusion of a demonstration of
"magic," sometimes you learn how the trick was accomplished.
Sometimes you are left mystified and frustrated. Many times you have already
blurted out, "I've seen this one before!" You are relieved you were
not the patsy of the magician and his accomplice, nor were you left frustrated
by participating in a new trick you do not yet understand. Yet, you have
learned nothing new. So, you have been cheated, after all.
When invited to "pick a card," in the back of your
mind you always know that there is no such thing as "magic," but you
always play along anyway. You hope you might learn how to add a new trick to
your own repertoire.
You carefully scrutinize the deck. Is it marked? You search
the innocence in the look on the face of the magician. His earnest smile
encourages your participation in his fun. His scheme, you fear, will leave you
feeling defeated.
You survey the scene, hoping to uncover the accomplice, if there
is one, and foil the two of them from making you their patsy.
At the very least, you are sincerely hoping not to be left
imploring, "How did you do that? Just tell me, I promise I won't give it
away!" You know the magician will just smile his smug little smile,
"Wouldn't you like to know?" He will actually say only,
matter-of-factly, "It's magic." He will pick them up quickly, the
deck of cards, sliding them from one hand to the other and back again, keeping
your attention on his eyes the whole while. Content that his years of
practicing for this trick have once again paid off, he will start shuffling the
cards again immediately. He will keep shuffling them until you go away.
Shuffling, shuffling, smiling, shuffling. Convincing you that, indeed, it was
true that "It's just an ordinary deck of cards!" Shuffling and still
shuffling, he is preparing for his next victim, and you are left confounded and
angry not to be let in on the secret so you can go on to find a victim of your
own to play the trick on.
Half the fun of "Pick a card, any card!" is never
knowing precisely which kind of a trick it is that you are encountering. You
just hear the magician's words. They convince you to take the risk and "Go
ahead. Pick one. Any one!" from the splayed deck which has been thrust
under your nose.
You can't decide which to watch more carefully, the
magician's hands or his eyes.
Resources for Analyzing and Improving One's Own Writing
Great writers master the craft of writing.
Purdue Writing Lab
"Reverse Outlining: An Exercise for Taking Notes and
Revising Your Work"
George Orwell
"Politics and the English Language," 1946
From the Orwell essay, this one is my favorite: "If it
is possible to cut a word out, always cut it out." I find that
contemplating each word separately gives quite a keen view of my work. If any
single word does not further the story and also provide excitement to the
reader in its own right, it's history!
The Story-Teller
You are a writer. You have decided to tell a story.
This is similar to going on a travel adventure. You will
leave us and our present environment, embark on a curious journey, experience
very interesting things, and then come back to tell us all about it.
All we can say is, "Bon voyage! Have fun! And don't
forget to write!"
Enjoy your words, while they belong to only you. Others may
clamor for them later.
Be forewarned that, should you let them escape, your words
may go run to play in someone else's head, too. This may actually be fun for
you, especially if you are there while they are reading, so you can see the
look on your reader's face as they experience your writing.
PREDICTION
Books of the future will provide this interactive treat for
writers, who will see the reader's face explode with emotion and amazement as
the author reaches into the nethermost areas of the reader's brain and touches
him directly with his words.
WARNING
Writers today already enjoy imagining the impact they have
on those touched by their words. This new Dancing-With-the-Reader function of
interactive books (available circa 2019) will only serve to encourage them
further!
The "Rules" of Writing
Do not be afraid to break any of the "rules" of
writing. Your words are your own, to play with as you desire. Allow yourself to
be creative in your use of language.
Be especially careful to make clear your purpose in breaking
the rules. Deliberate actions on the part of the writer might easily lead a
confused reader to attribute apparent transgressions to: a) shallowness in the
writer's personality; b) gaps in the writer's education; c) a lack of expertise
with the writing process; or d) a glaring instance of oppositional behavior,
revealing a deep-seated abhorrence of authority and a dark side on par with a
team consisting of Darth Vader and Lord Voldemort [assuming that the seats on
the right-hand sides of both Count Dracula and Satan are already taken].
A poor writer is to be pitied, much as a blind beggar who
starves to death, standing and clanging his tin cup just outside the door of a
soup kitchen he cannot sense. It is bad enough that he will die of starvation
within inches of free food—he can smell the food!—the real tragedy is that
people pass by the tragic man all the time but no one has told him he can go
inside and help himself.
If you see instances of poor writing, please do the writer a
favor and TELL HIM!
The writer will be forever grateful for the heads-up, and
won't even think of polling your high-school friends to discover what
disgusting thing about you he could use in his next novel, just to get even, if
only in his mind.
Changing the "Real World"
I found quite interesting our writer's group's recent brief
discussion touching on whether clues to the sexual identity of a character
could be safely assumed in the following situation and whether that mattered.
One of our female writers had included in her story a character who had not as
yet been defined as male or female before beginning to play the daisy game,
plucking the petals of a daisy while saying, "He loves me, he loves me
not." We discussed and determined that the pronoun the character selected,
"He," does not necessarily tell the reader anything definitive about
the character's gender, gender identity, sexual orientation, or sexual
preference. Those complicated characteristics require more clues to pin down.
"Boys in real life simply do not play the daisy
game," I had argued. "It is a girl's game, played by romantic young
girls fantasizing about boys returning their affections. She says, 'He loves
me, he loves me not.' Boys don't play the daisy game, or if they do, they say, "She
loves me, she loves me not,' not 'He loves me, he loves me not.'"
"Unless they are gay," offered another of our
writers.
"I play that game, and when I do, I say, 'He loves me,
he loves me not,'" said the lone male writer in our group, without hinting
at his own sexual preferences.
"But, you are not a character in a book. You are a real
person. The reader does not know you, and the writer has not described the real
you. The writer has described for the reader a player of the daisy game who
chooses the pronoun 'He' in saying, 'He loves me, he loves me not,' and that is
enough of a clue for the reader to assume the character is female, unless the
writer goes on to specify otherwise."
My argument was in vain. The other writers defended the
author of the story as having provided a story element for her male character
which needed no further explanation.
I am old-fashioned and out-of-touch in assuming that today's
reader would rely on old stereotypes to make assumptions about the character.
What is the writer to do, to provide his reader with
shortcuts to understanding his characters, if he cannot rely on stereotype?
Is the boy who says "He loves me, he loves me not"
expressing wishes for his male heartthrob to return his own desires, or is he
mockingly aping his sister's practice of playing "that girly daisy
game"? Is his experience with the daisy game so limited that, in reciting
the words, he is simply repeating by rote exactly what he had heard or read,
"He loves me, he loves me not," with an immature understanding of the
implications of the questioning petal picker's words? If we don't know anything
else about who the male character is, an explanation is in order, to avoid the
reader's confusion. The reader needs to know what the author's intention was in
having his character play the daisy game. The reader should not be left hanging
with such a red herring.
I had argued that if those characteristics are irrelevant to
the story, they could safely be omitted, but if including mention of the daisy
game and no other relevant details presented the reader with only a partial
clue to the character's sexual characteristics, the writer has not told his
reader how and why it is important. Finding no other evidence to identify the
character as male or female, the reader might make the false assumption that
the character was female, simply because readers make assumptions based on
societal norms and their experience with the statistical distribution along a
Bell curve of common behavior patterns and human characteristics. If they
believe that it is most likely that it is a girl who would play the daisy game
using "He loves me" rather than "She loves me," they might
well assume the character is a female. It might be very distracting to find out
later that the assumption that the character was female was incorrect, as the
reader will then stretch his memory to try to determine whether any other clues
might also have been missed.
As readers, we generally make assumptions about a
character's undetermined characteristics based on what fits the statistical
norm on a Bell curve, either from our experience with real life or from our
experience with other literature in general. Unless directed otherwise by the
writer, we tend to disregard race, sex, age, nationality, sexual orientation,
gender identity, religion, height, weight, and preferences and characteristics
in so many areas. We simply assume we are reading about the average Joe, who
conforms to our preconceived stereotypes of "normal" characters in
most stories written in English: a young, white, Christian, heterosexual male
of average build, and of statistically average characteristics, who watches
television, goes to work, and has a family. We assume that if it was a girl,
the author would have told us. If any of our assumptions inaccurately describe
the character, we expect the writer will clarify for us in what ways the
character differs from the expected norm, and as early in the story as
possible. We develop expectations for that character based on our real life
experiences with the statistical distribution of the characteristics of the
population of the real world. More importantly, we base our expectations on
what we think society says is right and normal.
We expect characters to be sane, unless crazy is written
into the script. We don't have to be told that the roommate of a nun in a
nunnery is female. At one time it was safe to assume that all residents of a
college fraternity house were male, but that is no longer the case. Norms and
rules for society change, but it is often description of character we readers
rely on for clues as to which society the story is set in. If we read about a
female CEO of a major corporation in a story which is set in the present and
the writer does not mention her sex, we wrongly assume the CEO is male. If
later we learn she is pregnant, we are unpleasantly surprised, rightfully
annoyed with the writer that we were not warned aforehand to alter our
expectations. If we read about a male character fantasizing about his love
interest, we expect it will be a daydream about a woman, because it is a
commonly accepted fact that ninety percent of men are heterosexual (at least
that is what we have been told to believe).
The reader's assumptions reflect a society's assumptions, and
if we as writers can change our readers' assumptions, we can change society as
a whole. As a society, we have just recently learned that it is wrong to assume
anyone's sexual orientation based on statistics, where it used to be socially
acceptable to do so. If I knew of two unmarried twenty-somethings, I could feel
free to try to arrange a blind date and hope they would be "perfect for
each other" without first inquiring of them their sexual preferences. It
was assumed that an incorrigible bachelor might be a rogue, making him unfit
for marriage, but never was it just assumed that he was gay and that it would
be okay to set him up on blind dates with other unmarried men.
Each person is a unique individual. People do not always
"come out" and tell the rest of us what their sexual orientation is,
even in a story, and we have learned that we cannot make assumptions if we are
not told explicitly. If we see our male hero in our story and an attractive
available female shows up, we cannot assume that she is a suitable love
interest. This complicates things for modern writers in a way that writers of
yore did not have to deal with. In older stories, romantic themes could be
relied on to add underlying meaning in specific ways, simply because it was
understood that readers could make assumptions. Today, writers may have to
spell out very specifically what exactly it is they want us to know about their
characters. We readers now know we can't rely on clues about the character's
sexuality from the society he lives in or from the situations he finds himself
in. As writers and readers, we see now more variation in the possibilities a
writer is free to offer a character in expressing his sexuality. This causes
readers to put off forming expectations of what will happen next.
As writers, we can take on our society's stereotypes and
change the world, one reader at a time, by changing the reader's expectations
of what is "normal." We do this by pointing out details about how our
character differs from the norm, and leaving out details about how he is
similar to the majority of other characters found in the same society. For
instance, in a society where men regularly beat their wives, a writer's
character who does not beat his wife is seen as "different," and a reader
who is told that the character does not beat his wife changes his expectations
about what the character will do, and comes to expect that he may behave
differently than other "normal" men in the same situation. However,
if the writer in telling the story does not give the reader a clue in advance
that he is "different," and it turns out that he is a man who does
not beat his wife, the reader adjusts his own view of what the norms are, in
the world he is reading about. He was not told ahead of time that this character
was not a wife-beater; therefore, the reader has learned that the societal norm
in this story is that men do not beat their wives, even if in the real-world
society the reader lives in, it is the case that most men beat their wives.
The reader knows that a writer will clue him in about the
norms by pointing out a character's differences from the norm, but the writer
will be silent and not mention the character's attributes that conform to the
norm. If the reader has then changed his perception of what the societal norms
are, simply because he has trusted the writer to describe his fictional world
according to writing conventions, the writer has accomplished a change in the
reader's thought processes. The reader now has a new idea of what "normal"
is.
The fiction writer who does not tell the reader ahead of
time that his CEO is female, and on page 207 reveals she is pregnant, forces
the reader to reassess his own assumptions about society. If the writer had
considered it the norm that CEOs are mostly female, then he would of course not
bother to mention the fact that she is female, any more than he would mention a
character's heterosexuality if it is believed that the overwhelming majority of
the population is heterosexual. The reader, confronted with the writer's
description of a world where the overwhelming majority of CEOs are women, will
then second-guess his own original assumption that almost all CEOs are male,
and may then discard his initial assumption based on what he may come to
believe is a false or old-fashioned stereotype that is no longer true. The next
time that reader reads about a CEO, he is likely to assume that the character
is at least equally likely to be male or female, or more likely to be female,
since the writer has planted that suggestion in his subconscious.
In this way, the writer has the power to change the
assumptions made by readers. If the writer convinces the reader that the new
norms in his fiction actually reflect the new realities of the real world, the
reader now has acquired new beliefs about the real world.
Therefore, to change the world's views on women taking over
in the boardroom, a writer should not give a clue that the powerful, successful
executive is a woman, not until the last page of the story. She does everything
a normal woman executive does, and the reader learns that she is a normal
executive, who does everything the same way a male executive would. In the
story, she has been just as cut-throat as the next corporate head-honcho, and
it is only on the last page that she is late to a meeting because her newborn
threw up on her suit as she was leaving for work and she had to change her
clothes. That is an event which, of course, also happens to male executives
with children, but it is her changing of her "skirt" that gives her
sex away, and not the fact that she has been nurturing her infant, which both
men and women do. The reader comes to see that it is normal and expected that a
CEO would be a woman, and it is a short step from believing it about a fictional
world to believing it about the real world.
Alternatively, for a writer to alter a reader's perception
that males are the norm in the area of who controls decision-making at the top
of the corporate ceiling, it may suffice to introduce as CEO a male character
with a first name ambiguous with regard to his sex, and very early on in the
story purposefully describe him as "male," as a way to tell the
reader, "Aha! You thought you were reading about an ordinary CEO, and
ordinary CEOs, as everyone knows, are female. But, my character is a
successful, powerful CEO, who also happens to be male. Surprise!" The
reader is surprised, not that the CEO is a male, but he is surprised at
himself, that he thought he expected a CEO to automatically be a male, when obviously
the writer is telling him that he should have been expecting the CEO to be a
female.
The writer tells the reader what the norms are, by pointing
out how his character differs from the norm. A writer never wastes the reader's
time pointing out the "obvious." That would be like having a
character who lives in Bermuda say to another character, "Honey, I just
checked the thermometer, and would you believe it, it is 82 degrees Fahrenheit
outside today?" In Bermuda, it is just about always a balmy 82 degrees, every
single day. That is so perfectly normal for Bermuda that it borders on the
ridiculous to point it out.
The writer wants his reader to make assumptions that are
correct about the world, so that his expectations are properly set up, and he
can surprise him with a good story. The reader loves a surprise, and the writer
can't wait to give him an extraordinary one.
Therefore, in order for a writer to change the real world,
the only thing he must do is to make his assumptions about the norms of the
world he wants to live in, and then only mention to the reader those attributes
of his characters that "differ" from that which is found to be true
of the majority of the inhabitants of his created society.
This is why stories about superheroes and extreme villains
are so popular. The writer describes good and evil as outside the norm. The
reader already knows that not everyone in his real life world is a hero,
beginning with himself as an example of just an ordinary guy, and he wants to
believe that there are few villains and that their bad behavior will be
contained so his own personal safety is not at risk. When the writer depicts a
villain and calls attention to their villainy as being far outside the societal
norm, the reader is gratified that evil-doers are so easily identified and
rare. As the writer describes the heroic efforts of the champion, the reader
feels happy to learn that, although evil-fighters braver and stronger than he
himself are rare, they exist and will answer the call to duty to protect
society, so that he himself may continue on with his ordinary life. The teams
of multiple superheroes now in popular movies portray a world in which the
reader is made to feel even safer, that no matter how bad the evil is which is
faced by society, there will be no need for the reader himself to alter his
pattern in daily existence, as more and more others will rise to extinguish the
bad guys. It is even better that the good guys rising up look just like
ordinary guys like himself, because in real life, when he looks around, all he
sees are more ordinary guys. It is comforting to know that some of these
ordinary guys are actually superheroes in disguise, and can be counted on to
reveal themselves as heroes when needed. The reader knows that he himself is
not a superhero in disguise, but can relax without feeling the pressure of
being on-call to take on that role. He can relax even though when he looks
around his ordinary world he does not see the strong heroes around him: day to
day, the truly good guys are incognito.
Regardless
Consider whether you might omit from the beginning of any
sentence any single word which is followed by a comma. "Honestly,"
"frankly," "literally," "regardless," and
"actually" are all words that tend to say to the listener,
"Whatever you may have heard before now, disregard it, because I am about
to say something so much more important, truthful, accurate, and
unbiased."
This can have the effect of making one sound pretentious.
However, judicious use of the single word followed by a
comma at the beginning of one's sentences can, indeed, accomplish a desired
effect. It may serve to wake up the listener and alert him that it is time to
start paying attention, because you have been holding out until now with polite
conversation, and you are about to convey the one important idea you want him
to take away from your discussion.
POETRY vs. DRAIN MONSTER
POETRY: 1
DRAIN MONSTER: 0
My muse lurks in my shower, and showers me with poetry as
soon as I start to shampoo. Almost always, the inspired words escape and are
sucked down the drain by the Bathtub Drain Monster before I can rinse the soap
from my eyes, get a hand dry, and reach pen and paper. The verses I allow to
get away are usually cute but not vibrant.
However, this morning I managed to capture a particularly
vicious haiku and wrestle it to the page!
I am celebrating my hard-won victory with a relaxing session
of viewing the snow-scape photos I took while on a drive over the mountains of
Sussex County on a winter's day following the season's first flurries.
NOTE: This tiny essay has been provided as a Pubic Service
Announcement for writers, to let them know they are not alone in experiencing
the saddening, sudden loss of some of their greatest ideas: It happens while
showering, driving, having sex, dreaming, jogging, and in countless instances
when inspiration hits but one finds oneself otherwise occupied and unable to
reach a word-recording device before the Muse jealously takes back her words
and refuses to negotiate a ransom.
Organizing My Words
One of the hardest tasks I face as a writer is finding a way
to organize the various types of writing I do and then save my words online
somewhere labeled in a meaningful way so that I can access them for quick
reference.
Where was that haiku poem I wrote, about hiding under the blankets
eating chocolate chip cookies and writing bad haiku?
What did I do with my
recipe for the pumpernickel bread bowl with the especially delicious spinach
artichoke dip I now want to serve on Superbowl Sunday?
Did I ever publish those
thoughts I had on how to assure that I get out of bed every morning with a
specific purpose in mind and a plan of action for each day?
I want to
self-publish four season books of my favorite haiku and I'm sure that I've put only
a few of my hundreds of winter poems online so far.
Why do I have thousands of
essays, poems, short stories, novels, blog posts, and more in various stages of
completion saved on my computer in a file entitled no more clearly than "WORK"?
An argument for the practice of writing poetry
All wordsmiths must practice the conquest of the poem. Consider that writing poetry forces one to make important word choices. Selecting the proper set of letters to exquisitely express one's thoughts is like preparing a new recipe from scratch. One must examine one's word pantry, check each possibility for a freshness date, and go shopping if the right ingredient is not found on the shelf. Not only is it important to garner the exact amount of each flavorful component needed, but all must be combined using both established technique and ingenious creativity, and the result honed with a preciseness of skill which can only be gained through experience. The finished work is judged by its aroma, consistency, mouth feel, nutritional value, and the degree to which it enhances feelings of delight as they spring forth from natural taste buds which have been trained to accept an elegance of style. What is finally ingested must be a work of art which will sustain a sense of beauty in the consumer and leave an enduring satisfaction in its wake.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
